| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 35 | |
| 4. |  | GARRETT, R.; NILES, M.; GIL, J.; VALENTIM, J. F. Enabling conditions for integrated crop and livestock systems in the United States, Brazil, and New Zealand: A comparative analysis of incentives and barriers across three regions. In: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FOREST SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS, 3., 2015, Brasília, DF. Towards sustainable intensification: proceedings. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. 1 p. Resumo AJPS.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre. |
|    |
| 5. | | GARRETT, R. D.; GIL, J. D. B.; VALENTIM, J. F. Transferência de tecnologia: desafios e oportunidades para Adoção de ILPF na Amazônia brasileira legal. In: BUNGENSTAB, D. J.; ALMEIDA, R. G. de; LAURA, V. A.; BALBINO, L. C.; FERREIRA, A. D. (ed.). ILPF: inovação com integração de lavoura, pecuária e floresta. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. cap. 36, p. 599-615.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre. |
| |
| 8. | | GARRETT, R. D.; CAMMELLI, F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; LEVY, S. A.; VALENTIM, J. F.; VIEIRA, I. Forests and sustainable development in the Brazilian Amazon: history, trends, and future prospects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 46, p. 2.1-2.28, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 9. | | TSUKUI, A.; VENDRAMINI, P.; GARRETT, R.; SCHOLZ, M. B.; EBERLIN, M.; BIZZO, H. R.; REZENDE, C. Chemical profile of green Arabica coffee bean submitted to semi-dry and dry processing by electrospray ionization mass spectro. In: IBERO-AMERICAN, 1.; BrMASS CONFERENCE ON MASS SPECTROMETRY, 6., 2016, Rio de Janeiro. Resumos Eletrônicos... São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Espectrometria de Massas, 2016. 1 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
|  |
| 11. | | GARRETT, R. D.; NILES, M.; GIL, J.; DY, P.; REIS, J. C. dos; VALENTIM, J. F. Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis. Sustainability, Switzerland, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 12. | | GARRETT, R.; CORTNER, O.; GIL, J. D. B.; REIS, J. C. dos; FERREIRA, J. N.; VALENTIM, J. F. Challenges and opportunities for the adoption of integrated farming systems: lessons from Brazil and beyond. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION, 1., 2019, Campo Grande, MS. Studies, methods and experiences: abstracts. Campo Grande, MS: Embrapa Gado de Corte, 2020. p. 31-41. (Embrapa Gado de Corte. Documentos, 279). Editors: Mariana de Aragão Pereira, João Augusto Rossi Borges, Carla Heloisa Faria Domingues.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 13. | | CASTRO, G. dos S.; SOUSA, T.; YAMAGISHI, M. E. B.; SILVA, G. F. da; GARRETT, R.; SOMAN, L.; KOOLEN, H. Identification of new peptaibols in the strain of Trichoderma amazonicum MMSRG 38A isolated from açaí fruit. In: BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON NATURAL PRODUCT (BCNP), 9.; MEETING ON MICROMOLECULAR EVOLUTION, SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY (RESEM), 35., 2023, Salvador. Proceedings [...]. Campinas: Galoá, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
| |
| 14. | | CORTNER, O.; GARRETT, R. D.; VALENTIM, J. F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; NILES, M. T.; REIS, J. C. dos; GIL, J. Perceptions of integrated crop-livestock systems for sustainable intensification in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, v. 82, p. 841-853, Mar. 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 19. | | GARRETT, R. D.; GARDNER, T. A.; MORELLO, T. F.; MARCHAND, S.; BARLOW, J.; BLAS, D. E. de; FERREIRA, J. N.; LEES, A. C.; PARRY, L. Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecology and Society, v. 22, n. 3, Art. 27, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 20. | | GARRETT, R.; SCHMIDT, E. M.; PEREIRA, L. F. P.; KITZBERGER, C. S. G.; SCHOLZ, M. B. S.; EBERLIN, M. N.; REZENDE, C. M. Discrimination of arabica coffee cultivars by electrospray ionization fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry and chemometrics. LWT - Food Science and Technology, v. 50, n. 2, p. 496-502, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 35 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/03/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/02/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GARRETT, R. D.; NILES, M.; GIL, J.; DY, P.; REIS, J. C. dos; VALENTIM, J. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
Rachael D. Garrett, Boston University; Meredith Niles, University of Vermont; Juliana Gil, Boston University / Wageningen University; Philip Dy, Harvard University; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-Acre. |
|
Título: |
Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sustainability, Switzerland, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017. |
|
DOI: |
10.3390/su9030473 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultura sustentable; Agroecologia; Brasil; Estados Unidos; Integração lavoura-pecuária (iLP); Integrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS); Nova Zelândia; Política pública. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura sustentável; Ecologia vegetal; Políticas públicas. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agroecology; Brazil; New Zealand; Public policy; Sustainable agriculture; United States. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/172323/1/2017-cpamt-julio-reis-policies-reintegrating-cls-comparative-analyses.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/157974/1/26289.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02614naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2087334
005 2018-02-07
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3390/su9030473$2DOI
100 1 $aGARRETT, R. D.
245 $aPolicies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems$ba comparative analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aThe reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region.
650 $aAgroecology
650 $aBrazil
650 $aNew Zealand
650 $aPublic policy
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aUnited States
650 $aAgricultura sustentável
650 $aEcologia vegetal
650 $aPolíticas públicas
653 $aAgricultura sustentable
653 $aAgroecologia
653 $aBrasil
653 $aEstados Unidos
653 $aIntegração lavoura-pecuária (iLP)
653 $aIntegrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS)
653 $aNova Zelândia
653 $aPolítica pública
700 1 $aNILES, M.
700 1 $aGIL, J.
700 1 $aDY, P.
700 1 $aREIS, J. C. dos
700 1 $aVALENTIM, J. F.
773 $tSustainability, Switzerland$gv. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
